Namely, Parallels and Microsoft. There are people working on solutions of a kind. Design, Optimize, Connect A few weeks ago Architosh sat down with Chris Yanchar, Director, Building Design. The latest version of Autodesk’s multidisciplinary BIM software, Revit 2019, aims to deliver on features Revit users have been requesting as well as new functionality to help capture design intent and better connect designers and fabricators. Autodesk Revit For Mac 123 Autodesk Make.
![]() When Will Autodesk Make Revit Mac 123 AutodeskPersonally, I want to maintain file-format compatibility with the AEC industry in the US, while using the OS of my choice. FBX is the file format originally native to Autodesk MotionBuilder, a system used for creating, editing.What we're all waiting for is software compatibility at multiple points from multiple vendors before even getting to Autodesk choosing to develop a Mac-native Revit version. Running 64-bit Windows on M1 Mac with Parallels 16 | AutoCAD, Revit & Gami.These are all the fbx 3d models we have at RenderHub. Mac android emulator for gamesI can only think something similar will happen if (preferably when) Revit is brought to the Mac.Even if a Mac specific version of Revit is not developed, Microsoft's expansion to ARM processors, and AMD's looking to purchase ARM, combined with Intel's year's-long fumbling on development, ought to help push ARM into the mainstream on the Windows side.So surely you must accept that you can run more software that architects use on Windows. If I remember correctly, Autodesk had some people move their AutoCAD seats from Windows to Mac when they brought ACAD back to the Mac, but they also had an increase in their user base by gaining new users from the Mac world. But I see that less likely than Autodesk making Revit Mac-native.I see people running Revit on a Mac in the future because it's the combination they choose to. I have seen before my eyes a row of PC laptops (often fairly cheap but with dedicated graphics) seriously outperform much more expensive MacBook Pros sitting next to them, performing the same tasks. Whenever I have a student with problem with these programs I generally can tell without asking that they are using a Mac.I've been teaching a whole range of architectural software as part of a degree program for many years, and I'm always amazed by the number of new students who falsely believe Apple computers are better for the work we do, when in fact the opposite is true. The workaround for the ones still with intel CPUs is to simply switch over to Windows, which will of course allow the Adobe software to be installed without a problem (even though it doesn't run as well as on a PC running Windows). Adobe software is the latest problem, because Apples block upgrades to their OS, even on quite recent MacBook Pros, which in turn blocks most Adobe apps on subscription. Even software available to run on MacOS (such as ArchiCAD and SketchUp) doesn't run as well as on a machine with dedicated graphics. Now that Apple have given up on dedicated GPUs for their laptops and the Mini, it also rules out most 3D and rendering apps (Vray, Lumion, Twinmotion etc.). The sort of computer you need to run Revit) their performance is terrible.If you think development of ARM will improve performance with smaller gate size, just remember that the M1 gate is not very many silocon atoms across, and you can't have gates smaller than an atom, that's just physics. ARM may have some advantages on laptops and small desktops (like the mini) because they have better power consumption, SoC and small gate size, but compared to a high-end PC setup for 3D work (i.e. At present the fastest x86 processors (which also allow dedicated graphics to further improve performance) far outperform ARM processors. From my experience I haven't heard of a risc based architecture that supports dedicated graphics. If you don't understand all of this and just want to buy a computer that will allow you use all or the architectural software you need, just get a PC, and don't get sucked in by the unpaid Apple marketing fanboys, who in their selfishness, are trying to convince people to spend a whole lot more money on an Apple computer that in many cases simply won't do the job requiredInteresting that you point to ARM being the future for programs like Revit. ARM) might be good for some people, but when we went through all of this in the 80s and 90s, it became pretty clear that the reason x86 processors were better for 3D is that the complex instructions risc doesn't allow were often used for 3D.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorVeronica ArchivesCategories |